Passing School Bus Virginia Reckless Driving Arlington

Passing A School Bus Reckless Driving Charge – Virginia Lawyers

There are many different penalties for a Passing A School Bus Reckless Driving Charge In Virginia.

If you are dealing with a Passing A School Bus Reckless Driving Charge In Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Passing A School Bus Reckless Driving Charge In Virginia.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Passing School Bus Virginia Reckless Driving Arlington
Passing School Bus Virginia <a href='http://srislawyer.com/virginia-reckless-driving-law/lawyer-arlington-virginia-reckless-driving/' title="<a href='http://srislawyer.com/virginia-reckless-driving-law/lawyer-arlington-virginia-reckless-driving/' title="<a href='http://srislawyer.com/virginia-reckless-driving-law/lawyer-arlington-virginia-reckless-driving/' title="<a href='http://srislawyer.com/virginia-reckless-driving-law/lawyer-arlington-virginia-reckless-driving/' title="reckless driving Arlington Virginia”>reckless driving Arlington Virginia”>reckless driving Arlington Virginia”>reckless driving Arlington Virginia”>reckless driving Arlington

Luther Camp v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant’s motion to set aside the guilty verdict rested on his claim that the Commonwealth failed to prove that the words “School Bus” were on the front and rear of the bus that he was charged with illegally passing in letters that were at least eight inches high, as required by Va. Code Ann. § 46.1-190(f). The court noted that the prosecution’s witnesses, including the school bus driver and the school bus supervisor, had testified that the letters of the words “School Bus” were from three to six inches high; though the school bus supervisor later claimed that the letters were actually over six inches high, he failed to specify their height. The court granted defendant’s motion to set aside the jury verdict that convicted him of reckless driving.

If you are facing a traffic case in Arlington, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Va. Code Ann. § 46.1-190(f), which declares that illegally passing a stopped school bus constitutes reckless driving, requires that the words “School Bus” be in black letters at least eight inches high on the front and rear of the bus. The Supreme Court of Virginia has said that in order to convict a defendant for violating § 46.1-190(f), the burden is on the Commonwealth to show that the school bus was properly marked or identified.
  • The standard in a criminal case is proof beyond a reasonable doubt and it is elementary that an accused in a criminal case is presumed to be innocent until his guilt has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt; the burden rests upon the Commonwealth to establish such guilt and the burden never shifts. Every material element of the offense charged must be proved in order to find a defendant guilty.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Passing A School Bus Reckless Driving Charge In Virginia.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Arlington Court House Detail:

Arlington Circuit Court

1425 North Courthouse Road,
Arlington, VA 22201.

Arlington General District Court

1425 North Courthouse Road,
Suite 2400, Second Floor,
Arlington, VA 22201.

Arlington Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

P. O. Box 925,
1425 North Courthouse Rd, Ste 4100,
Arlington County Justice Center,
Arlington, VA 22216.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.